ISSN: 1309 - 3843 E-ISSN: 1307 - 7384
FİZİKSEL TIP VE REHABİLİTASYON
BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
www.jpmrs.com
Kayıtlı İndexler


ORIJINAL ARAŞTIRMA

Ankilozan Spondilitli Hastalarda Entezit ve Ayak Dizabilitesi
Enthesitis and Foot Disability in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Received Date : 26 Feb 2021
Accepted Date : 06 Jan 2022
Available Online : 10 Jan 2022
Doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2021-82627 - Makale Dili: EN
J PMR Sci. 2022;25(2):133-40
ÖZET
Amaç: Entezit ankilozan spondilitin (AS) primer klinik bulgularındandır. Alt ekstremite entezopatileri ayak ağrısına ve fonksiyonel yetersizliğe neden olabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, AS’li hastalarda kas-iskelet ultrasonografisi kullanılarak enteziti ve ayak yetersizliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: AS’li 101 ve 42 sağlıklı kontrol hastası enthesal anormallikler açısından gri skala ultrasonografi ile incelendi. Bulgular, Glasgow Ultrason Entesit Skorlama Sistemi (GUESS) kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Ağrı, yetersizlik ve aktivitede kısıtlanma alt ölçeklerinden oluşan Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi [Foot Function Index (FFI)], ayak fonksiyonunun değerlendirilmesi için AS ve sağlıklı kontrol grubundaki tüm hastalara uygulandı. Hastalık aktivitesi ve fonksiyonel durum AS’li hastalarda sırasıyla Bath AS Hastalık Aktivite İndeksi [Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)], Bath AS Fonksiyonel İndeksi [Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI)] ve Bath AS Metroloji İndeksi [Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI)] kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: AS’li hastaların yaş ortalaması 41,5 idi ve hastaların %28,7’si kadındı. AS’li hastaların ortalama GUESS skoru 8,00 (1,00- 23,00) idi ve ortalama total FFI ve ağrı, yetersizlik ve aktivitede kısıtlanma alt ölçeklerindeki skorları sırasıyla 14,70 (0,00-75,20), 16,60 (0,00-82,80), 16,10 (0,00-84,40) ve 4,00 (0,00-60,00) idi. AS’li hastalarda GUESS skoru, total FFI ve tüm alt ölçek skorları kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu (p=0,001). GUESS skoru BASDAI ve BASMI ile korelasyon gösterdi (p=0,031, p=0,001). Sonuç: AS’li hastalarda entezit ve ayakta yetersizlik daha yüksek orandaydı. Ayak tutulumu ve buna bağlı gelişen yetersizlik klinik veya ultrasonografik olarak değerlendirilmeli ve AS’li hastalarda uygun şekilde yönetilmelidir. Entezit varlığı ve ayakta yetersizliğin yüksek olması, AS’li hastalarda hastalık aktivitesini olumsuz etkilemektedir.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Enthesitis is a primary clinical feature of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Lower extremity enthesopathy may cause foot pain and functional disability. The aims of this study were to evaluate enthesitis by using musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) and foot disability in patients with AS. Material and Methods: 101 patients with AS and 42 healthy controls were examined for enthesal site abnormalities by using gray-scale US. The findings were assessed by using the Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Scoring System (GUESS). The Foot Function Index (FFI), which comprised of pain, disability, and activity limitation subscales, was measured in all the patients with AS and healthy controls for assessment of foot function. Disease activity and functional status were assessed using the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) and Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) respectively, in patients with AS. Results: The mean age of patients with AS was 41.5 years and 28.7% of the patients were woman. The median GUESS score was 8.00 (1.00-23.00), and, the median total FFI and scores in all the pain, disability, and activity limitation subscales were 14.70 (0.00-75.20), 16.60 (0.00-82.80), 16.10 (0.00-84.40), and 4.00 (0.00-60.00), respectively in patients with AS. The GUESS score, total FFI, and all the subscales scores were significantly higher in the patients with AS than in the controls (p=0.001). GUESS score showed correlation with BASDAI and BASMI (p=0.031, p=0.001). Conclusion: The severities of enthesitis and foot disability were higher in patients with AS. Foot involvement and disability should be evaluated either clinicily or ultrasonographicily and managed properly in patients with AS. Presence of enthesitis and high level of foot disability negatively affect the disease activity and flexibility in patients with AS.
REFERENCES
  1. Borman P, Koparal S, Babaoğlu S, et al. Ultrasound detection of entheseal insertions in the foot of patients with spondyloarthropathy. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25:373-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  2. Wang CH, Feng Y, Ren Z, et al. Performance of ultrasound to monitor Achilles enthesitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis during TNF-a antagonist therapy. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34:1073-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Rezvani A, Bodur H, Ataman S, et al. Correlations among enthesitis, clinical, radiographic and quality of life parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24:651-6. [PubMed] 
  4. Gandjbakhch F, Terslev L, Joshua F, et al; OMERACT Ultrasound Task Force. Ultrasound in the evaluation of enthesitis: status and perspectives. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13: R188. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  5. Genc H, Duyur Cakit B, Nacir B, et al. The effects of sulfasalazine treatment on enthesal abnormalities of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:1104-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  6. Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Perrotta FM, et al. Clinical and ultrasonography assessment of peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:2080-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Hamdi W, Bouaziz Chelli M, Ghannouchi MM, et al. Performance of ultrasounds compared with radiographs to detect chronic enthesitis signs in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:497-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  8. Aydin SZ, Karadag O, Filippucci E, et al. Monitoring Achilles enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis during TNF-alpha antagonist therapy: an ultrasound study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:578-82. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  9. Genc H, Cakit BD, Tuncbilek I, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of tendons and enthesal sites in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with ankylosing spondylitis and healthy subjects. Clin Rheumatol. 2005;24:272-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  10. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, et al. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:1694-8. [PubMed] 
  11. Akkoc Y, Karatepe AG, Akar S, et al. A Turkish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index: reliability and validity. Rhe umatol Int. 2005;25:280-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  12. Yanik B, Gürsel YK, Kutlay S, et al. Adaptation of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index to the Turkish population, its reliability and validity: functional assessment in AS. Clin Rheumatol. 2005;24:41-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  13. Yaliman A, Sen EI, Eskiyurt N, et al. Turkish translation and adaptation of foot function index in patients with plantar fasciitis [Ayak fonksiyon indeksi'nin plantar fasiitli hastalarda Türkçe'ye çeviri ve adaptasyonu]. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014;60:212-23. [Crossref] 
  14. Balint PV, Kane D, Wilson H, et al. Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:905-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  15. Falcao S, Castillo-Gallego C, Peiteado D, et al. Can we use enthesis ultrasound as an outcome measure of disease activity in spondyloarthritis? A study at the Achilles level. Rhe umatology (Oxford). 2015;54:1557-62. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  16. Kiris A, Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, et al. Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis by power Doppler ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:522-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  17. Ruta S, Acosta Felquer ML, Rosa J, et al. Responsiveness to therapy change of a global ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34:125-32. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Lehtinen A, Taavitsainen M, Leirisalo-Repo M. Sonographic analysis of enthesopathy in the lower extremities of patients with spondylarthropathy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1994;12: 143-8. [PubMed] 
  19. Sahli H, Bachali A, Tekaya R, et al. Involvement of foot in patients with spondyloarthritis: Prevalence and clinical features. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25:226-30. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  20. Ozaras N, Havan N, Poyraz E, et al. Functional limitations due to foot involvement in spondyloarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28: 2005-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  21. Erdem CZ, Sarikaya S, Erdem LO, et al. MR imaging features of foot involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:110-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  22. Mesci E, Mesci N, Madenci E, et al. Ankilozan spondilitli hastalarda ayak dizabilitesi: klinik ve ultrasonografik değerlendirme [Foot disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a clinical and ultrasonographic assessment]. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine. 2016; 6:864-8. [Link] 
  23. Laatiris A, Amine B, Ibn Yacoub Y, et al. Enthesitis and its relationships with disease parameters in Moroccan patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:723-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  24. Hamdi W, Chelli-Bouaziz M, Ahmed MS, et al. Correlations among clinical, radiographic, and sonographic scores for enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Joint Bone Spine. 2011; 78: 270-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  25. Spoorenberg A, van Tubergen A, Landewé R, et al. Measuring disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: patient and physician have different perspectives. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:789-95. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  26. Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van Tubergen A, et al. Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:127-32. [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  27. Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, Kamanli A, et al. Evaluation of a quantitative scoring of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2007;13:303-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed]