ISSN: 1309 - 3843 E-ISSN: 1307 - 7384
FİZİKSEL TIP VE REHABİLİTASYON
BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
www.jpmrs.com
Kayıtlı İndexler


ORIJINAL ARAŞTIRMA

Genç Erişkinlerde Aksiyel Ağrının Aksiyel Rotasyon, Gövde İmbalansı ve Fizik Aktivite ile İlişkisi
The Rela onship Between Axial Pain and Axial Rota on, Trunk Imbalance, Physical Ac vity in Young Adults
Received Date : 16 Mar 2018
Accepted Date : 06 Sep 2018
Doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2018-60511 - Makale Dili: TR
J PMR Sci 2019;22(1):1-6
ÖZET
Amaç: Genç erişkinlerde omurga ağrısının aksiyel rotasyon, gövde imbalansı ve fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ile ilişkisini basit muayene metotları kullanarak araştırmaktır. Gereç Yöntemler: Çalışmaya Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi öğrencileri davet edildi. Çalışmanın içeriği anlatıldı, kabul edenlerle çalışma gerçekleştirildi. Kesitsel olarak planlanan çalışmada demografik veriler kaydedildi. Ağrı Nordic Anketi’ne göre, fiziksel aktivite düzeyi Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi ile, koronal balans şakül ile aksiyel rotasyon skolyometre ile saptandı. Katılımcılar ağrısı olanlar ve olmayanlar olmak üzere 2 gruba ayrılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 62’si erkek, 89’u kadın 151 kişi katıldı. Ortalama gövde koronal imbalansı 0,29±1,59 cm, ortalama T7 aksiyel rotasyon 0,19±1,81 derece, ortalama L3 aksiyel rotasyon 1,9±1,76 derece, ortalama fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri 2582,11±2314,80 olarak saptandı. Ağrılı olan ve olmayan katılımcılar arasında yaş cinsiyet, fiziksel aktivite düzeyi açısından fark bulunmadı. Ağrının aksiyel rotasyon derecesi, gövde imbalansı ve fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ile ilişkisi gözlendi. Beden kitle indeksi ile L3 aksiyel rotasyon arasında negatif ve gövde koronal imbalansı ile T7 aksiyel rotasyon arasında pozitif anlamlı korelasyon saptandı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre, genç erişkinlerde aksiyel ağrı; aksiyel rotasyon derecesi, gövde imbalansı ve fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ile ilişkili değildir. Gövde imbalansı T7 rotasyon derecesi ile aksiyel rotasyon beden kitle indeksi ile ilişkili bulunmuştur.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between spinal pain and axial rotation, trunk imbalance and physical activity level in young adults using simple examination methods. Material and Methods: Pamukkale Faculty of Medicine students were invited to study. The content of the work was eplained, the trial was realized with those who accepted. Demographic data were recorded in this cross-sectional study. Pain was evaluated according to the Nordic questionnaire, the level of physical activity was determined with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, coronal balance was evaluated by plumb, and axial rotation was determined by scoliometer. Participants were divided into two groups, those with pain and those with no pain. Results: 62 men and 89 women participated in the study. Mean trunk coronal imbalance was 0.29±1.59 cm, mean T7 axial rotation was 0.19±1.81 degrees, mean L3 axial rotation was 1.9±1.76 degrees, mean physical activity levels were 2582.11±2314.80. There was no difference between the painful and non-painful participants in terms of age, gender and physical activity level. There was no correlation between pain with degree of axial rotation, trunk imbalance and physical activity level. There was a negative correlation between body mass index and L3 axial rotation, and there was a positive correlation between trunk coronal imbalance and T7 axial rotation. Conclusion: According to the results of our study; axial pain is not associated with axial rotation grade, trunk imbalance, and physical activity level in young adults. The trunk imbalance was associated with the T7 rotation grade and the axial rotation was associated with the body mass index.
REFERENCES
  1. Hooten WM, Cohen SP. Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: a clinically focused review for primary care specialists. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1699-718. [Crossref] 
  2. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000;84:95-103. [Crossref] 
  3. Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO, et al. The course of low back pain from adolescence to adulthood: eight year follow-up of 9600 twins. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:468-72. [Crossref] 
  4. Harrison DE, Betz JW, Cailliet R, et al. Radiographic pseudoscoliosis in healthy male subjects following voluntary lateral translation (side glide) of the thoracic spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:117-22. [Crossref] 
  5. Scoliosis Research Society. Medical Professionals. Glossaries. Available at: http://www.srs.org/professionals/ glossary/glossary.asp. Accessed June 28, 2004.
  6. Grosso C, Negrini S, Boniolo A, et al. The validity of clinical examination in adolescent spinal deformities. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;91:123-5.
  7. Cohen L, Kobayashi S, Simic M, et al. Non-radiographic methods of measuring global sagittal balance: a systemic review. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;12:30. [Crossref] 
  8. Kahraman T, Genc A, Goz E. The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into Turkish assessing its psychometric properties. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;21: 2153-60. [Crossref] 
  9. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-95. [Crossref] 
  10. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111:278-84. [Crossref] 
  11. Richards BS, Scaduto A, Vanderhave K, et al. Assessment of trunk balance in thoracic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:1621-6. [Crossref] 
  12. Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17:179-84. [Crossref] 
  13. Wirth B, Knecht C, Humphreys K. Spine Day 2012: spinal pain in Swiss school children-epidemiology and risk factors. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:159. [Crossref] 
  14. Jeffries LJ, Milanese SF, Grimmer-Somers KA. Epidemiology of adolescent spinal pain: a systematic overview of the research literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:2630-7. [Crossref] 
  15. Briggs AM, Smith AJ, Straker LM, et al. Thoracic spine pain in the general population: prevalence, incidence and associated factors in children, adolescents and adults. A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:77. [Crossref] 
  16. Vikat A, Rimpela M, Salminen JJ, et al. Neck or shoulder pain and low back pain in Finnish adolescents. Scand J Public Health. 2000;28:164-73. [Crossref] 
  17. Hakala PT, Saarni LA, Punamaki RL, et al. Musculoskeletal symptoms and computer use among Finnish adolescents-pain intensity and inconvenience to everyday life: a crosssectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:41. [Crossref] 
  18. Harreby MS, Nygaard B, Jessen TT, et al. [Risk factors for low back pain among 1.389 pupils in the 8th and 9th grade. An epidemiologic study]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2001;163:282-6.
  19. Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO. Are lifestyle-factors in adolescence predictors for adult low back pain? A cross-sectional and prospective study of young twins. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:27. [Crossref]  [PMC] 
  20. Troussier B, Davoine P, de Gaudemaris R, et al. Back pain in school children. A study among 1178 pupils. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26:143-6.
  21. Cardon G, Balague F. Low back pain prevention's effects in schoolchildren. What is the evidence? Eur Spine J. 2004;13:663-79. [Crossref]  [PMC] 
  22. Kostuik JP, Bentivoglio J. The incidence of low-back pain inadult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981;6:268-73. [Crossref] 
  23. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, et al. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA. 2003;289:559-67. [Crossref] 
  24. Buttermann GR, Mullin WJ. Pain and disability correlated with disc degeneration via magnetic resonance imaging in scoliosis patients. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:240-9. [Crossref] 
  25. Schwab F, Dubey A, Pagala M, et al. Adult scoliosis: a health assessment analysis by SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:602-6. [Crossref] 
  26. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:2164-9. [Crossref] 
  27. Jackson RP, Simmons EH, Stripinis D. Coronal and sagittal plane spinal deformities correlating with back pain and pulmonary function in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14:1391-7. [Crossref] 
  28. Topalis C, Grauers A, Diarbakerli E, et al. Neck and back problems in adults with idiopathic scoliosis diagnosed in youth: an observational study of prevalence, change over a mean four year time period and comparison with a control group. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;8:12:20.
  29. Cagliyan Turk A, Okan S, Fidan N ve ark. Bel agrili genc eriskinlerde lomber ve servikal manyetik rezonans goruntuleme bulgularninn karsilastirilmasi. J PMR Sci. 2018;21:15-21. [Crossref] 
  30. Kim SJ, Lee TH, Yi S. Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic Korean subjects. Part 3: cervical and lumbar relationship. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013;53:167-73. [Crossref] 
  31. Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population: results of the bone and joint decade 2000-2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:S75-82. [Crossref] 
  32. Ambrose KR, Golightly YM. Physical exercise as non-pharmacological treatment of chronic pain: why and when. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:120-30. [Crossref] 
  33. Marley J, Tully MA, Porter-Armstrong A, et al. A systematic review of interventions aimed at increasing physical activity in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain--protocol. Syst Rev. 2014;19: 106. [Crossref] 
  34. Mac-Thiong JM, Transfeldt EE, Mehbod AA, et al. Can c7 plumbline and gravity line predict health related quality of life in adult scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34: E519-27. [Crossref] 
  35. Kim J, Hwang JY, Oh JK, et al. The association between whole body sagittal balance and risk of falls among elderly patients seeking treatment for back pain. Bone Joint Res. 2017;6:337-44. [Crossref] 
  36. Imagama S, Ito Z, Wakao N, et al. Influence of spinal sagittal alignment, body balance, muscle strength, and physical ability on falling of middle-aged and elderly males. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1346-53. [Crossref] 
  37. Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, et al. Relationships between falls, spinal curvature, spinal mobility and back extensor strength in elderly people. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28:82-7. [Crossref] 
  38. Ilharreborde B. Sagittal balance and idiopathic scoliosis: does final sagittal alignment influence outcomes, degeneration rate or failure rate? Eur Spine J. 2018;27:48-58. [Crossref]