ISSN: 1309 - 3843 E-ISSN: 1307 - 7384
FİZİKSEL TIP VE REHABİLİTASYON
BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
www.jpmrs.com
Kayıtlı İndexler


ORIJINAL ARAŞTIRMA

Pulmoner Telerehabilitasyon Kabullenme Skalası-Hasta Versiyonu’nun Türkçe Adaptasyon ve Validasyon Çalışması
Turkish Adaptation of the Patient Version of the Tele-Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale
Received Date : 26 Mar 2024
Accepted Date : 06 Nov 2024
Available Online : 27 Nov 2024
Doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2024-103074 - Makale Dili: EN
Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2025;28(1):7-12
ÖZET
Amaç: Pulmoner telerehabilitasyon (TR) literatürde etkili ve yararlı bir yöntem olarak bildirilmiştir. Hastaların TR’yi kabullenme düzeyleri tedaviye uyum ve beklenen yararı önemli derecede etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, “Patient Version of the Tele-Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale”nın (TPRAS-PV) Türkçeye adaptasyonu ve validasyonudur. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Skalanın orijinal versiyonunu oluşturan yazarlardan gerekli izinler alındıktan sonra skala ilk önce ileri düzey İngilizce ve Türkçe bilen bir araştırmacı tarafından Türkçeye çevrildi, daha sonra tekrar İngilizceye çevrilerek ikinci İngilizce versiyon tekrar Türkçeye çevrildi. İki Türkçe versiyon karşılaştırılarak tutarsızlıklar ve anlam karmaşaları giderildikten sonra skalanın son hâli hazırlandı. TPRAS PV skalası Türkçeye “Pulmoner Telerehabilitasyon Kabullenme Skalası-Hasta Versiyonu (PTKS-HV)” olarak çevrildi. Çeşitli hastalıklardan dolayı pulmoner rehabilitasyona (PR) yönlendirilen toplam 57 hasta yazılı onamları alındıktan sonra skalanın son versiyonu ile çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Bulgular: Yapılan istatistiksel analizler sonucunda Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin değeri 0,816 olarak bulundu. Barlett testi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0,001). Yapılan faktör analizi sonrasında 3 faktör belirlendi. Faktörlerden birincisi TR’nin PR’de algılanan kullanışlılık, ikincisi TR’nin PR’de algılanan kullanım kolaylığı, üçüncüsü ise PR’de TR kullanma niyeti idi. Alt ölçeklerin ve ölçeğin iç tutarlılık değerleri yeterli düzeyde bulundu (Cronbach alfa ≥0,7). Sonuç: PTKS-HV Türk hasta popülasyonunda PR için TR’nin hastalar tarafından kabullenmesini ölçmekte güvenilir ve geçerli bir skaladır.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Pulmonary telerehabilitation (TR) has been described in academic literature as a beneficial and efficient form of treatment. The acceptance level of patients towards TR plays a crucial role in their compliance and the benefits they receive. This study aims to translate, demonstrate the consistency, and establish the validity of the Turkish version of the Patient Version of the Tele-Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale (TPRAS-PV). Material and Methods: After obtaining the necessary permissions from the original scale, the scale was initially translated by a fluent Turkish-English translator and then independently back-translated into English. This second English version was then translated into Turkish, and the two Turkish versions were compared to address inconsistencies and potential misunderstandings in the questions' meanings. The TPRAS-PV scale was translated to Turkish as “Pulmoner Telerehabilitasyon Kabullenme Skalası-Hasta Versiyonu” (PTKS-HV). Fifty-seven patients who have been referred to the pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) unit have received the translated version. Results: In the statistical analyses, The Kaiser- Meyer-Olkin value was 0.816 and Barlett’s test was significant (p<0.001). In factor analysis, 3 factors were identified: the first factor reflects the perceived usefulness of TR in PR, the second factor reflects perceived ease of use of TR in PR, and the third factor reflects the behavioral intention to use TR in PR. Internal consistency of all subscales revealed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.7). Conclusion: PTKS-HV is a reliable and coherent instrument for assessing the acceptance of pulmonary TR among Turkish patients.
REFERENCES
  1. Reardon J, Casaburi R, Morgan M, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD. Respir Med. 2005;99 Suppl B:S19-27. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  2. Donner CF, Muir JF. Selection criteria and programmes for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients. Rehabilitation and Chronic Care Scientific Group of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:744-57. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Lameris M, Atkins C. Pulmonary rehabilitation. InnovAiT. 2014;7:151-8. [Crossref] 
  4. Brennan D, Tindall L, Theodoros D, et al. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2010;2:31-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  5. Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, et al. Telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4:e7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  6. Almojaibel AA, Munk N, Goodfellow LT, et al. Development and validation of the tele-pulmonary rehabilitation acceptance scale. Respir Care. 2019;64:1057-64. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Jayasuriya R, Caputi P. Computer attitude and computer anxiety in nursing. Validation of an instrument using an Australian sample. Comput Nurs. 1996;14:340-5. [PubMed] 
  8. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al; ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94-104. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  9. Coşkun ÖK, Yağcı İ, Göçmen S, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of "cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale". Gulhane Med J. 2019;61:59-63. [Link] 
  10. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960;20:141-51. [Crossref] 
  11. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2013.
  12. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:268-74. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  13. McCue M, Fairman A, Pramuka M. Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21:195-205. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  14. Tchero H, Tabue Teguo M, Lannuzel A, et al. Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e10867. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  15. Georgeadis A, Brennan D, Barker L, et al. Telerehabilitation and its effect on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Aphasiology. 2004;18:639-52. [Crossref] 
  16. Cherney LR, van Vuuren S. Telerehabilitation, virtual therapists, and acquired neurologic speech and language disorders. Semin Speech Lang. 2012;33:243-57. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  17. Seidman Z, McNamara R, Wootton S, et al. People attending pulmonary rehabilitation demonstrate a substantial engagement with technology and willingness to use telerehabilitation: a survey. J Physiother. 2017;63:175-81. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Brennan DM, Mawson S, Brownsell S. Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;145:231-48. [PubMed] 
  19. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43:159-72. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  20. Bossen D, Veenhof C, Dekker J, et al. The usability and preliminary effectiveness of a web-based physical activity intervention in patients with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:61. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  21. Özdemir T, Candemir I, Ergün P, et al. Patients with COPD who underwent pulmonary rehabilitation in Turkey: prevalence, distribution, and mortality. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;50:141-7. [Link] 
  22. Ucan ES, Keyf AI, Aydilek R, et al. Pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis: review of Turkish reports. Thorax. 1993;48:171-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  23. Gunen H, Hacievliyagil SS, Yetkin O, et al. Prevalence of COPD: first epidemiological study of a large region in Turkey. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19:499-504. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  24. Öngen G, Börekçi Ş, İçmeli ÖS, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis incidence in Turkish prisons: importance of screening and case finding strategies. Tuberk Toraks. 2013;61(1):21-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  25. Reynolds SJ, Parker D, Vesley D, et al. Cross-sectional epidemiological study of respiratory disease in Turkey farmers. Am J Ind Med. 1993;24:713-22. [Crossref]  [PubMed]