ISSN: 1309 - 3843 E-ISSN: 1307 - 7384
FİZİKSEL TIP VE REHABİLİTASYON
BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
www.jpmrs.com
Kayıtlı İndexler


ORIJINAL ARAŞTIRMA

Diz Osteoartriti Olan Hastaların Dokularında Fonoforez Sonrası Yüksek Performanslı Sıvı Kromatografisi ile İbuprofen Düzeylerinin Saptanması: Kontrollü Bir Ön Çalışma
Detection of Ibuprofen Levels by High Performance Liquid Chromatography After Phonophoresis in the Tissues of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Controlled Preliminary Study
Received Date : 11 Oct 2021
Accepted Date : 14 Mar 2022
Available Online : 28 Mar 2022
Doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2021-86584 - Makale Dili: EN
J PMR Sci. 2022;25(2):205-12
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmada total diz artroplastisi planlanan diz osteoartritli hastalarda fonoforez uygulaması sonrası eklem dokularındaki ilaç konsantrasyonunun saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Evre 4 diz osteoartritli (OA) 17 hasta, ultrason parametrelerine göre 6 gruba ayrıldı ve ameliyat öncesi 3 seans ibuprofen fonoforezi uygulandı. Altı grup aşağıdaki gibi ayrılmıştır: Grup 1; 5 dakika, frekans 0 MHz, güç 0 W/cm2, sürekli mod; Grup 2; 5 dakika, frekans 1 MHz, güç 1 W/cm2, sürekli mod; Grup 3; 5 dakika, frekans 1 MHz, güç 1,5 W/cm2, sürekli mod; Grup 4; 5 dakika, frekans 1 MHz, güç 1,5 W/cm2, darbe modu; Grup 5; 8 dakika, frekans 1 MHz, güç 1,5 W/cm2, sürekli mod; Grup 6; 5 dakika, frekans 1 MHz, güç 2 W/cm2, sürekli mod. Ameliyat sırasında hastalardan kemik, eklem sıvısı ve eklem dokusu örnekleri alındı. Yüksek performanslı sıvı kromatografik yöntemi, izole edilmiş insan eklem sıvısı, eklem dokusu ve kemikten ibuprofen seviyelerinin belirlenmesi için kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların eklem dokularında ibuprofen tespit edildi. Sinovyal sıvıda en yüksek ibuprofen konsantrasyonları Grup 3 ve 5’te tespit edildi. Kemikte en yüksek konsantrasyonlar Grup 2’de elde edildi ve sinovyal dokuda Grup 2 ve Grup 3’te elde edildi. Sonuç: İbuprofenin eklem dokularına optimum penetrasyonu, 1 MHz ve 1-1.5 W/cm2 ve sürekli ultrason modu ile elde edildi. OA’lı hastalarda fonoforez etkili bir tedavi yöntemi olarak görülmektedir.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This study is aimed to detect the drug concentration in articular tissues after phonophoresis application in patients with knee osteoarthritis who were planned to undergo total knee arthroplasty. Material and Methods: Seventeen patients with grade 4 knee OA were allocated to 6 groups according to ultrasound parameters and three sessions of ibuprofen phonophoresis were applied before surgery. Six groups divided into as follows: Group 1; 5 minutes, frequency 0 MHz, power 0 W/cm2, continuous mode; Group 2; 5 minutes, frequency 1 MHz, power 1 W/cm2, continuous mode; Group 3; 5 minutes, frequency 1 MHz, power 1.5 W/cm2, continuous mode; Group 4; 5 minutes, frequency 1 MHz, power 1.5 W/cm2, pulse mode; Group 5; 8 minutes, frequency 1 MHz, power 1.5 W/cm2, continuous mode; Group 6; 5 minutes, frequency 1 MHz, power 2 W/cm2, continuous mode. Bone, synovial fluid and synovial tissue samples were obtained from patients during the surgery. A high-performance liquid chromatographic method was used for the determination of ibuprofen levels from isolated human synovial fluid, synovial tissue and bone. Results: Ibuprofen was detected to the articular tissues of patients. The highest concentrations of ibuprofen in synovial fluid were detected in Group 3 and 5. The highest concentrations in bone were obtained in Group 2 and in synovial tissue were obtained in Group 2 and Group 3. Conclusion: Optimal penetration of ibuprofen to articular tissues was obtained with 1 MHz and 1-1.5 W/cm2 and continuous ultrasound mode. Phonophoresis is seemed as an effective treatment modality in patients with OA.
REFERENCES
  1. Ogura M, Paliwal S, Mitragotri S. Low-frequency sonophoresis: current status and future prospects. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1218-23. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  2. Rafanan BS Jr, Valdeca-as BF, Lim BP, et al. Consensus recommendations for managing osteoarthritic pain with topical NSAIDs in Asia-Pacific. Pain Manag. 2018;8:115-28. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Souza J, Meira A, Volpato NM, et al. Effect of phonophoresis on skin permeation of commercial anti-inflammatory gels: sodium diclofenac and ketoprofen. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1623-30. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  4. Mitragotri S, Kost J. Low-frequency sonophoresis: a review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:589-601. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  5. Machet L, Boucaud A. Phonophoresis: efficiency, mechanisms and skin tolerance. Int J Pharm. 2002;243:1-15. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  6. Ebrahimi S, Abbasnia K, Motealleh A, et al. Effect of lidocaine phonophoresis on sensory blockade: pulsed or continuous mode of therapeutic ultrasound? Physiotherapy. 2012;98:57-63. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Cage SA, Rupp KA, Castel JC, et al. Relative acoustic transmission of topical preparations used with therapeutic ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2126-30. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  8. Saliba S, Mistry DJ, Perrin DH, et al. Phonophoresis and the absorption of dexamethasone in the presence of an occlusive dressing. J Athl Train. 2007;42:349-54. [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  9. Darrow H, Schulthies S, Draper D, et al. Serum dexamethasone levels after decadron phonophoresis. J Athl Train. 199934:338-41. [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  10. Koeke PU, Parizotto NA, Carrinho PM, et al. Comparative study of the efficacy of the topical application of hydrocortisone, therapeutic ultrasound and phonophoresis on the tissue repair process in rat tendons. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:345-50. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  11. Davick JP, Martin RK, Albright JP. Distribution and deposition of tritiated cortisol using phonophoresis. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1672-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  12. McElnay JC, Matthews MP, Harland R, et al. The effect of ultrasound on the percutaneous absorption of lignocaine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;20:421-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  13. Boonhong J, Suntornpiyapan P, Piriyajarukul A. Ultrasound combined transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (UltraTENS) versus phonophoresis of piroxicam (PhP) in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind, controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31:507-13. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  14. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, et al; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64:465-74. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  15. Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JW, et al; European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1125-35. [PubMed] 
  16. McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:363-88. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  17. Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Franke TP, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: effectiveness of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities. An updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:1623-34.e23. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Takla MKN, Rezk-Allah SS. Immediate effects of simultaneous application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound phonophoresis on active myofascial trigger points: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97:332-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  19. Altan L, Kasapoğlu Aksoy M, Kösegil Öztürk E. . Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study. Ultrasonics. 2019;91:201-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  20. García I, Lobo C, López E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonophoresis and iontophoresis in impingement syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:347-58. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  21. Kozanoglu E, Basaran S, Guzel R, et al. Short term efficacy of ibuprofen phonophoresis versus continuous ultrasound therapy in knee osteoarthritis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2003;133:333-8. [PubMed] 
  22. Herwadkar A, Sachdeva V, Taylor LF, et al. Low frequency sonophoresis mediated transdermal and intradermal delivery of ketoprofen. Int J Pharm. 2012;423:289-96. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  23. Tang H, Wang CC, Blankschtein D, et al. An investigation of the role of cavitation in low-frequency ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug transport. Pharm Res. 2002;19:1160-9. [PubMed] 
  24. Ueda H, Mutoh M, Seki T, et al. Acoustic cavitation as an enhancing mechanism of low-frequency sonophoresis for transdermal drug delivery. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32:916-20. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  25. Asano J, Suisha F, Takada M, et al. Effect of pulsed output ultrasound on the transdermal absorption of indomethacin from an ointment in rats. Biol Pharm Bull. 1997;20:288-91. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  26. Boucaud A, Garrigue MA, Machet L, et al. Effect of sonication parameters on transdermal delivery of insulin to hairless rats. J Control Release. 2002;81:113-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  27. Kim TY, Jung DI, Kim YI, et al. Anesthetic effects of lidocaine hydrochloride gel using low frequency ultrasound of 0.5 MHz. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2007;10:1-8. [PubMed] 
  28. Tachibana K, Tachibana S. Transdermal delivery of insulin by ultrasonic vibration. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991;43:270-1. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  29. Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal protein delivery. Science. 1995;269:850-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  30. Smith NB, Lee S, Shung KK. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal in vivo transport of insulin with low-profile cymbal arrays. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29:1205-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  31. Lee S, Newnham RE, Smith NB. Short ultrasound exposure times for noninvasive insulin delivery in rats using the lightweight cymbal array. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51:176-80. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  32. Park EJ, Werner J, Smith NB. Ultrasound mediated transdermal insulin delivery in pigs using a lightweight transducer. Pharm Res. 2007;24:1396-401. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  33. Santoianni P, Nino M, Calabro G. Intradermal drug delivery by low-frequency sonophoresis (25 kHz). Dermatol Online J. 2004;10:24. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  34. Katz NP, Shapiro DE, Herrmann TE, et al. Rapid onset of cutaneous anesthesia with EMLA cream after pretreatment with a new ultrasound-emitting device. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:371-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  35. Becker BM, Helfrich S, Baker E, et al. Ultrasound with topical anesthetic rapidly decreases pain of intravenous cannulation. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:289-95. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  36. Benson HAE, McElnay JC. Topical non-steroidal anti-flammatory products as ultrasound couplants: their potential in phonophoresis. Physiotherapy. 1994;888880:74-6. [Crossref] 
  37. Regenthal R, Krueger M, Koeppel C, et al. Drug levels: therapeutic and toxic serum/plasma concentrations of common drugs. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:529-44. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  38. Whitlam JB, Brown KF, Crooks MJ, et al. Transsynovial distribution of ibuprofen in arthritic patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;29:487-92. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  39. Glass RC, Swannell AJ. Concentrations of ibuprofen in serum and synovial fluid from patients with arthritis [proceedings]. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978;6:453P-454P. [Crossref]  [PubMed]